r/SipsTea 5d ago

PSA Chugging tea

Post image
27.9k Upvotes

318 comments sorted by

View all comments

369

u/BowlPotential4753 5d ago

The thing is you are not chilling with them, you are leading the conversation which is entirely different

125

u/RatInACoat 5d ago

As the other guy said, depends. I used to do some streaming, and when I tried to lead the conversation and talk about something specific during a stream I'd just get distracted by people in chat. With larger streamers chat is more of a singular entity that brings up more and less relevant topics you can ignore, but smaller streamers can keep track of everyone and every message. The streamer is still the one who has to moderate the conversation when necessary, but it's much more two sided than having one person who sometimes picks out messages from a thousand viewers.

41

u/LazyCat2795 5d ago

Yea, the job of a 2-3 viewer streamer, a 10-20 viewer streamer a 100~ viewer streamer and so on, is wildly different sometimes.

6

u/Hymnosi 4d ago edited 4d ago

I used to be part of a streaming community that originated prior to twitch (think livestream/justintv era). It started with one person who was entertaining, then a community member set up a website that would list out the people from the same community who were streaming, all under a single chat, using embeds. People would move from stream to stream as a group and maintain the same chatroom.

Once streaming, and more specifically making money from streaming, became more popular it fell apart. Maintaining two separate chats and being entertaining at the same time is tough, and people with a lot more skill at mass entertainment took center stage.

I'm sure the concept can still exist, but it's a bit more difficult now. In theory, discord can replace it, though having to join a voice chat to see video, where it takes over the whole screen, kinda kills it for me. Also, you don't get passive community recruitment like you would with other things, there's a lot of steps involved to get someone into discord and into your stream, versus just clicking a link and viewing it.

1

u/17times2 4d ago

And then the 10k+ rooms where it's just a STREAM of messages. You couldn't even hold a conversation with another person in the chat since you'd have 0.8 seconds to see and read it.

35

u/Troo_66 5d ago

Not necessarily. It depends on the chat and the streamer. I used to watch a guy where he would mostly play chill games or something he found relaxing like Diablo 2. Most people in the chat knew each other and the conversation would just go around. He doesn't stream much these days, but it's because his life has been busy in a good way, so I'm glad for him.

5

u/sycamotree 4d ago

I watch a pro tekken streamer who will read chat in the middle of his games lmao. Mostly just reacting to questions but yeah. He'll have a whole convo while doing some of the toughest tech in the game lol no clue how he does it.

-4

u/HansElbowman 5d ago

That's still leading the conversation, since the stream is the catalyst of the conversation. If the people keep in contact outside the stream then that's just a group chat and I wouldn't ever describe that as "having 12 viewers on twitch". I'd describe it as being in a group chat with 12 other people.

The first commenter is correct. Viewers are not people chilling with you, they are people observing you for their entertainment. A friendship may form from this, but it isn't the norm. The dynamic of a stream is fundamentally transactional and someone who doesn't recognize this is the one whose mind has been warped by the internet, not the other way around.

1

u/Troo_66 4d ago

You must be a wonderful person to be around

This is an arbitrary distinction. People still sat there and watched the gameplay. That is a viewership therefore these people were viewers. Whether or not it was more like a public group chat is completely irrelevant, by definition of the word viewer you are just wrong.... on top of being insufferable

1

u/HansElbowman 4d ago

Talk about being insufferable. You seem to be agreeing with me, but haven’t thought hard enough to realize it so you’re throwing emotions at me like I said something insulting to you. Also, if you think there is no distinction between having actual friends in a group chat and interacting with people viewing your stream, you are one of those people I mentioned who have let the internet warp your brain.

Figure out what is happening in this thread and try to reply again.

0

u/Troo_66 4d ago

No I'm calling you insufferable because I can't call you the r word on reddit without the auto remove bots getting my ass.

It is a distinction without difference in your attempt to sound smarter than you are

1

u/HansElbowman 4d ago

You think there’s no difference between a group of friends in a group chat and a streamer interacting with their chat?

3

u/Morthicus 4d ago

So more like a decently sized cult! Awesome!

3

u/SensitiveAd5962 4d ago

My brother regularly streams to <20 people. At any given time about half of them are in VC.

6

u/shidncome 5d ago

It's not 12 people either its like 3 of their friends on phones/pc.

2

u/jrr6415sun 4d ago

Also lots of bots, thats like saying your alexa counts as your friend

4

u/Trimyr 4d ago

But ... Alexa's my best friend

2

u/IsThisThingOn69lol 4d ago

leading conversation.... pandering for subs/donations... to-may-toes, to-mah-toes.

2

u/Dr_Crendor 4d ago

Nah man, i stream very rarely these days but ive got this dude that comes and hangs out in my chat who totally leads the convo lol. He tells me about his dnd campaigns and honestly it was my favorite part of streaming. I love dnd and i love that he was comfortable sharing all the details about a campaign i knew nothing about, and i was fully invested every time. It really depends on the situation

1

u/whatarechimichangas 4d ago

I think it's more like playing for a crowd.

1

u/nrs5813 4d ago

I'm on the opposite side here. The _actual_ problem is people equating 12 people watching online with hanging with a real person.